Ace the FOCL Exam 2025 – Lead with Confidence and Conquer Your Path!

Question: 1 / 400

In Joe's act of setting fire to Bill's house, how is he held accountable for the fire that spread to Becky's home?

He is not responsible

He is responsible due to transferred intent

Joe is held accountable for the fire that spread to Becky's home due to the principle of transferred intent. This legal doctrine holds that when an individual intends to harm one person but inadvertently harms another, the intent to harm is transferred from the intended victim to the actual victim. In this scenario, Joe intended to set fire to Bill's house, and even though the fire spread to an unintended target, Becky’s home, Joe’s original intent to commit a harmful act persists.

This principle is crucial in understanding liability, as it reinforces the notion that one cannot escape responsibility merely because the actual harm resulted in unintended consequences. The focus here is on the intention behind the act, which directly relates to Joe’s liability for any resulting damage, including that to Becky's property.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

He is only responsible if he had prior knowledge

He is responsible for negligence

Next Question

Report this question

Download FOCL Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy